'In the conduct of their parliamentary duties,
Members of the House shall base their actions on consideration
of the public interest, and shall resolve any conflict between
their personal interest and the public interest at once, and in
favour of the public interest.' - the Lord's Code of Conduct
The Lords have spoken. The coalition with a little help from Labour Peer, Lord Warner chose to vote in favour of the government to keep section 75 regulations of the Health and Social Care Act in place. In doing so, they imposed increased legal pressures on the new commissioners to put out services to tender, which will fragment the NHS into the hands of private companies.
The Lords have spoken. The coalition with a little help from Labour Peer, Lord Warner chose to vote in favour of the government to keep section 75 regulations of the Health and Social Care Act in place. In doing so, they imposed increased legal pressures on the new commissioners to put out services to tender, which will fragment the NHS into the hands of private companies.
The Members’
financial interests
represent every stage of the healthcare value chain: from private equity firms
that fund private healthcare companies, to holding shares in those same
companies. They are Chairmen of companies who run NHS estates, are involved in
PFI deals, are partners in legal firms that seal those deals, advisers to
private hospitals, they also represent companies in pharmaceutical media,
medical equipment, care homes, lobbying, and health insurance.
You name it,
the corporations have it covered; and the list of vested interests in both the
House of Commons and the Lords is so great, it is effectively a healthcare coup
d’état against our parliamentary institutions (see partial list below). Yet all
of the peers with such vested interests were able to vote on the Health and
Social Care bill and the section
75 Regulations, that now threatens to hand over large chunks of the NHS into
private company hands.
The public,
once again were placed in a situation whereby the future direction of the NHS was
in the hands of unelected individuals who have vested interests in the outcome
of their vote. One in four Conservative
Lords have these interests, as well as one in six Labour
Lords, one in six Crossbench
Lords and one in ten
Liberal Democrats. This is democracy today in Britain.
The position
they hold blurs the line between public and private duty. Some of the companies
who employ Lords have already won contracts in the new NHS since the
health bill became an Act; in some cases
at the very same
moment the bill was being debated. The outcome of the vote has been made, but
the institutional corruption remains.
Below, I have a list of unelected Peers from the upper chamber who represent the corporations that cover every part of the healthcare chain – they have it all wrapped up.
Below, I have a list of unelected Peers from the upper chamber who represent the corporations that cover every part of the healthcare chain – they have it all wrapped up.
A selection of interests
Frontline services: Lord Nash
When
Chairman of Care UK, John Nash – a Conservative Donor – made a donation of
£21,000 to then-shadow health secretary, Andrew Lansley, co-author of the
Health and Social Care bill. Nash now sits on the free market board of the
Centre for Policy Studies, which has produced several papers on dismantling the
NHS. Voted to reject the removal of the Section 75 regulations.
PFI: Lord Blackwell
Chairman of Interserve,
consultancy to NHS and private healthcare firms. Involved in PFI hospitals.
Company has entered
new avenues within the care industry made possible by the Health and Social
Care bill and by his vote on the bill. Voted to reject the removal of Section
75 regulations.
Management consultancy: Lord
Hamilton of Epsom - Has a directorship with MSB Ltd (managing consultancy), who have NHS,
Bupa, Nuffield Health and CareUK listed as their clients. Quotes: 'My Lords, surely one of the
problems of the National Health Service is the wall of money that was thrown at
a totally unreformed NHS by the last Government? Do we not need management
consultants now to show us the way forward.’ See article on him here.
Voted
to reject the removal of the Section 75 regulations.
Legal: Lord Clement-Jones
Managing
partner with global law firm DLA Piper who provide lobbying services to clients
in the health and social care sectors. Lord Clement-Jones nominated Lord Hameed
for his peerage. Lord Hameed
sits on the board of Alpha hospitals, part of the Alpha Healthcare (C&C
Alpha/C&C business solutions) group. The Alpha group has made significant
donations to the Liberal Democrat party. Voted to reject the removal of Section
75 regulations.
Shares: Baron Higgins
Holds in
excess of £50,000 of shares in Lansdowne UK Equity Fund, backers of private
hospital group Circle Holdings. Circle won the first contract to run a NHS
hospital – they are advised by Conservative MP Mark Simmonds. Voted to reject
the removal of Section 75 regulations.
Litigation: Lord Lang of Monkton
Conservative
– Director of Marsh & McLennan Companies that “help hospitals, insurers,
pharmaceutical companies and industry associations understand the implications
of changing policy environments”. Head of ACOBA – a so-called independent body
that advises on business appointments. See article on him and them here.
Voted to reject the removal of Section 75 regulations.
Care Homes: Lord Popat
Founder of
TLC group Ltd, who run private care homes. Lord Popat gave David Cameron a
donation, as a gift, of £25,000 a week after the Conservatives’ unveiled their
health ‘reforms’. David Cameron made the businessman a peer shortly after
getting into 10 Downing street. Voted to reject the removal of Section 75
regulations.
Pharmaceutical Communications – Lord Chadlington Chief Executive of Huntsworth Communications group – have major pharmaceutical companies as clients. Company gave £15,000 to Conservatives in August 2011, has given money every year since 2008. Labour’s Lord Puttnam is a director. Liberal Democrat’s Lord Alliance has shares. Neither member voted. For more on Lord Chadlington and Lord Alliance – see here and here.
Pharmaceutical Communications – Lord Chadlington Chief Executive of Huntsworth Communications group – have major pharmaceutical companies as clients. Company gave £15,000 to Conservatives in August 2011, has given money every year since 2008. Labour’s Lord Puttnam is a director. Liberal Democrat’s Lord Alliance has shares. Neither member voted. For more on Lord Chadlington and Lord Alliance – see here and here.
An adviser
to Pathology company, Synlab Ltd. He is a former adviser to Apax Partners, one
of the leading global investors in the healthcare sector. Chose to vote against
his party and with the coaltion (Labour).
Insurance: Lord Sharman
Chairman of
Aviva, has directorship and Shareholdings in Aviva plc. Baroness
McDonagh: Non Executive Director of Standard Life plc, which offers private
health insurance. Did not vote.
Recruitment: Baroness Bottomley
Chair of
Odgers Berndtson – recruitment company providing people for NHS Management
positions. Shares in Broomco Ltd, a
holding company of International Resources Group Ltd, which owns Odgers
Berndston. Richard Boggis-Rolfe, the chairman of Odgers Berndtson, has given £207,500
in donations to the Conservative party
between 28/09/2006 to 03/03/2010. Voted
to reject the removal of Section 75 regulations.
Out of Hours: Lord Filkin (Labour)
Adviser to
outsourcing giant Serco. Serco run out of hours services and were caught fiddling their data. Continue to be given contracts despite this. Did not vote.
For the life of me, ive looked for an article where a Labour m.p kicked up about Warner being a member of the right wing think tank Reform, asked some Labour on twitter no response, no surprise.
ReplyDeleteHe offers them the opportunity to say they are balanced which is patently absurd. He is basically a free market capitalist who votes on behalf of big business.
Deletewhy don't financial interests disqualify them from voting?
ReplyDeletePlease sign:
Deletehttp://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/44971
Surely Blair was a free-market capitalist who liked big business and acted to help it, with no attempt to return to public ownership those sectors of the economy which clearly don't work in the private sector; e.g., railways. Having espoused Thatcherism since 1994, Labour has some difficulty in offering a credible alternative.
ReplyDeleteOn your page, there is an out of date link to the e-petition to call for an end to Lords voting on issues they have a vested interest in:
ReplyDeletehttp://socialinvestigations.blogspot.de/p/lords-financial-links-to-companies.html
Could you possibly flag on your page that this link is to to an updated e-petition:
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/44971