The NHS Partners Network have responded to the
article linking them to Reform, and the Daily Telegraph. The statement is
written in full below along with the quote, which I used from the document
written by the director of the NHS Partners Network. I will be contacting them back in due course in which I will be expecting honest answers.
Friday, 3 August 2012
Thursday, 2 August 2012
The Telegraph, the Think Tank and a Very Dodgy Business
"And the whole
sequence of Telegraph articles and editorials on the importance of the
Government not going soft on public service reform, including some strong
pieces on health, is something I have been orchestrating and working with
Reform to bring about.’ - David Worskett – Director of NHS Partners Network –
Communication document written on 20th May 2011
This extraordinary
sentence is written by the director of private health lobby group David
Worskett, as part of an overall feedback for the NHS Partners Network’s members
towards the end of so-called ‘listening period’ in the Health bills passage.
Thursday, 26 July 2012
NHS Partners Network – who are they?
The start
The NHS Partners
Network formed in 2005 to provide a voice for private health companies, and was
initially made up of organisations involved in the government’s Independent
Sector Treatment Sector programme (ISTC). The ISTC initiative was to open up
non-emergency treatments to the private sector that would operate (no joke
intended) from treatment centres based within NHS hospitals.
When a leaked
document from the Health care Commission raised questions over the quality
standards within the ISTCs, the NHS Partners Network used its influence to make
sure a report on ISTC’s was less critical than otherwise would be.
In 2007, they
were voted on to the NHS confederation, the main representative organisation for
organisations offering NHS services.
Since the initial ISTC days, the Network has expanded to include
companies and organisations providing services to the NHS.
![]() |
Social Investigations conducted Lords research |
Why do they have influence?
The NHS Partners Network is largely made up of private healthcare companies, with a couple of non-profit organisations thrown in. Their current members list contains 7 companies with financial connections to MPs, Lords or former MPs.
The NHS Partners Network is largely made up of private healthcare companies, with a couple of non-profit organisations thrown in. Their current members list contains 7 companies with financial connections to MPs, Lords or former MPs.
A few examples of this are:
Alliance Medical Limited:
www.alliancemedical.eu.com
– Alan Milburn Alliance Medical runs diagnostic services for the NHS, including
in Birmingham and Falkirk. UNISON reported
that services were giving patients sub-optimal care, losing the NHS money
because of below-capacity uptake, and pressurising hospitals into using private
sector treatments.
Care UK:
www.careuk.com
– Andrew Lansley John Nash the Chairman of Care UK gave
donations of £21,000 to run Lansley’s office when he was shadow health
minister. Bridgepoint
who have Lord Patten of Barnes on their books purchased Care UK.
Circle:
www.circlehealth.co.uk
– Mark Simmonds MP is a strategic advisor - the self-styled “social enterprise” that became the
first private company to take over the management of an NHS hospital, is owned
by companies and investment funds registered in the British Virgin Islands, Jersey
and the Cayman Islands. See
Corporatewatch ‘An unhealthy business’
The full list of members is
below.
How have they used their influence?
When you have
connections like they have it certainly provides a platform to being able to
obtain high-level meetings.
According to
their 2007/08 annual report, they held ‘Major high-level’ meetings with
- Andy Burnham the Minister of State for Health.
- Mark Britnell, who was then the Director-General of Commissioning and System Management for the Department of Health. Mr Britnell has since moved to the private sector as Global Head of Health for business service giant KPMG, He famously said in 2010, while discussing reforms to a private healthcare conference: “In future, The NHS will be a state insurance provider not a state deliverer”, and that “The NHS will be shown no mercy and the best time to take advantage of this will be in the next couple of years'.
- Mark Simmonds as Conservative junior minister for Health Spokesman
The latter raises
some serious questions as to what part of the draft bill was influenced by the
network. In addition to this according to their 2007/08 Annual Report, in October 2007, they held 'informal conversations with Andrew Lansley' and the Conservative party conference, and perhaps more importantly, held a 'meeting with Lansley on the Conservative party's draft bill.'
The latter suggests that they had advanced warning of the bill and parts of its content which they may have influenced. When we consider who their members are (listed below) this might be considered to be giving them an unfair advantage and certainly more notice that the public were given.What was said? Did they put in anything to do with competition? Lansley had competition in mind when writing the White Paper, he just didn't bother telling the public who he is meant to represent.
The latter suggests that they had advanced warning of the bill and parts of its content which they may have influenced. When we consider who their members are (listed below) this might be considered to be giving them an unfair advantage and certainly more notice that the public were given.What was said? Did they put in anything to do with competition? Lansley had competition in mind when writing the White Paper, he just didn't bother telling the public who he is meant to represent.
Health and Social Care bill
In 2008 they had
a Meeting with then shadow health secretary, Andrew Lansley, on matters to do
with the Conservative party’s draft bill.
In October 2010, Simon Burns (the Minister for Health), Earl Howe, and
Andrew Lansley’s Special Advisor, Bill Morgan, attended two meetings with David
Worskett, the director of the NHS Partners Network. In the meetings, the
ministers reassured the lobby director that opposition to parts of the bill
increasing competition would soon ‘dissipate’.
A further meeting head with Earl Howe and Simon Burns
on the 19th May, 2011, went well. Earl Howe offered a ‘depiction’ of
the ‘Government position’, that meant ‘“choice” was a non-negotiable.’ This
view led Mr Worskett to say: ‘He could have been delivering a précis of our
briefing notes (which of course he had already seen)’. No wonder then that
later in the day at a National Stakeholder Forum, Earl Howe ‘endorsed [Mr
Worskett’s] arguments twice during the session on competition and regulation’.
Competition in the bill
A newly discovered document has revealed the lobby
group held a ‘lengthy’ discussion with the chair of choice and competition of
the NHS Future Forum Sir Stephen Bubb, during the Health bill ‘pause’.
In the meeting according to the document which was
intended for the eyes of the Network’s members only, Mr Worskett had ‘agreed on the approach he (Mr Bubb) would
take, what the key issues are, and how to handle the politics.’ He has, he
concluded, ‘not deviated from this for a moment throughout the period.’ Perhaps
it is this influence that they are referring to in the annual summary 2010/11
report where they say, one of their ‘main activities’ involved ‘influencing the
development of the NHS reforms’.
The NHS Partners Network are not finished lobbying
yet, having recently responded to the first stage of the health regulator’s
(Monitor’s) review into the fair playing field for NHS providers. They held a
meeting under the auspices of the right-wing think tank "Reform" with
David Bennett, the head of Monitor who are running the review. The room was
full of ‘like-minded’ people. The NHSPN’s press release announcing their
submission to the review states: ‘We look forward to working with Monitor
throughout the consultation process.’
NHS Partner Network members and connections
3Well Medical:
alma.3well.info/home
Alliance Medical Limited:
www.alliancemedical.eu.com
– Alan Milburn Alliance Medical runs diagnostic services for the NHS, including
in Birmingham[15] and Falkirk.[16] UNISON reported that services were giving
patients sub-optimal care, losing the NHS money because of below-capacity
uptake, and pressurising hospitals into using private sector treatments
Alliance Surgical Plc
: www.allsurgical.co.uk/
Assura Medical Limited
: www.assuramedical.co.uk - Baroness Morgan of Huyton Ex-director of failed care home, Southern Cross, is a member of the advisory committee board of Virgin Group Holdings Ltd. Virgin Healthcare Holdings is a subsidiary of them, who took over Assura Medical Limited and renamed them Virgin Care. Vivienne Mcvey
is a board
member/Director of Virgin Healthcare holdings and has represented NHS Partners Network when giving evidence on behalf of the Care Quality Commission (CQC). Ms McVey is a member of the CQC Providers Advisory Group and was a part of the NHS future forum and is also a member of an 'Independent' Panel set up by Lansley in March to look at the impact of the NHS
Constitution.
Barchester Healthcare: www.barchester.com – Baroness Ford – Chairman - Chairman of Grove Ltd, a holding company for for Barchester Health. Mike Parsons the Chief Executive was voted 2nd most influential person in healthcare by the HealthInvestor members.
Barchester Healthcare: www.barchester.com – Baroness Ford – Chairman - Chairman of Grove Ltd, a holding company for for Barchester Health. Mike Parsons the Chief Executive was voted 2nd most influential person in healthcare by the HealthInvestor members.
Baxter Healthcare: www.baxterhealthcare.co.uk/
Bupa Home Healthcare:
www.bupa.co.uk/home-healthcare
– Baroness Bottomley is a director, Lord Edmiston has shares, Lord Leitch is a
non-executive director, Baroness Liddell is an Associate member
Care UK:
www.careuk.com
– John (now Lord) Nash the then Chairman of Care UK gave donations of £21,000 to run Lansley’s
office when he was shadow health minister. Bridgepoint who have Lord Patten of
Barnes on their books purchased Care UK.
Circle
: www.circlehealth.co.uk
– Mark Simmonds MP is a strategic advisor -
Connect Physical Health:
www.connectphysiotherapy.co.uk
General Health Group
: www.generalhealthcare.co.uk
Harmoni CPO Limited:
www.harmoni.co.uk
Healthcare at Home:
www.healthcare-at-home.co.uk
InHealth
: www.inhealthgroup.com
InterHealth Canada:
www.interhealthcanada.co.uk
Medical Services:
www.medicalservicesuk.com
Nuffield Health
: www.nuffieldhealth.com
Oasis Dental Care Limited
: www.oasisdentalcare.co.uk
– the recently deceased Baron Newton of Braintree
Pfizer Health Solutions UK:
www.phsownhealth.co.uk
–
Owen Smith: MP for Pontypridd. A
former UK lobbyist for the American
pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, where he was head of government affairs from
2005-2007. Lord Goldsmith: Partner in International law firm Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, whose clients include Pfizer.
Primecare Primary Care:
www.primecare.uk.net
Ramsay Health Care UK
: www.ramsayhealth.co.uk
Spire Healthcare: www.spirehealthcare.com
- Cinven purchased them and Cinven are connected to Patricia Hewitt
The Horder Centre
: www.horder.co.uk
UK Specialist Hospitals Limited
: www.uk-sh.co.uk
UnitedHealth UK:
www.unitedhealthuk.com
Vanguard Healthcare Solutions
Ltd:
www.vanguardhealthcare.co.uk
Friday, 20 July 2012
Health Minister and Lansley’s Special Advisor held Meetings with Private Health Care Lobby Group to ‘reassure’ Before Parliament Aware of Bill
A newly discovered document
has revealed a top-level political trio, held a secret meeting with a private healthcare
lobby group to reassure them about the likely calming of opposition to the
healthcare reform, two months before the bill was even introduced to
parliament.
So, the NHS Partners Network were able to access the very top of our political tree before our elected politicians had even been given a chance to debate the bill in the Commons. And no minutes were taken.
In October 2010, Simon
Burns (the Minister for Health), Earl Howe, and Andrew Lansley’s Special
Advisor, Bill Morgan, attended two meetings with a private healthcare lobby
group, NHS Partners Network (NHSPN). These meetings have just come to light,
following the discovery of another document written by the NHSPN, which
revealed the discussions took place three months before the Health and Social
Care bill was introduced to parliament.
The purpose of the
discussion, according to the document, was to give members an opportunity to
‘express their support for the Government’s policy of Any Willing Provider
(explained below) and moves towards greater patient choice.’
In addition, the members
could express any ‘concerns about whether a level playing field would truly be
created’.
So, the NHS Partners Network were able to access the very top of our political tree before our elected politicians had even been given a chance to debate the bill in the Commons. And no minutes were taken.
The meeting informed the
network of a ‘command paper’ that was about to be published by the Department
of Health, to set out the ‘principles of the NHS reforms more clearly’. They
also ‘received assurances’ that the Government will make it clear to
commissioners what the Any Willing Provider (AWP) policy means for them, and
that they intend to ‘adhere’ to the reform timetable.
The update on where the
government was in terms of action was backed up with further assurance that
opposition to the AWP policy would not last long. The introductory paragraph of
the document highlighted that both ministers and Mr Morgan expressed the view
that any problems with the implementation of the AWP policy, such as opposition
to commissioning of the independent sector from GP commissioners – were likely
to be ‘short-term’ and ‘dissipate’ in the future.
However, several months
after the meetings the situation had changed, because once the content of the
white paper had been realised, a near total rejection from both the public and
the medical profession resulted in the government taking a ‘pause’.
The so-called ‘listening
exercise’ required a temporary group to be set up, called the NHS Future Forum
which had Sir Stephen Bubb,
a David Cameron appointment, in charge of competition and choice. We now know
that Sir Bubb worked with the NHSPN, who together influenced the direction of
discussion. The newly established forum meant a new set of lobbying was
required, and the NHSPN made sure they were at the helm, as revealed in their
annual 2010/11 summary report:
‘This (pause) prompted a
major new effort to communicate our views to the NHS Future Forum, and to the
top-level political decision-makers to whom the forum will report.’
Part of the concerns the
lobby firm had now centred on the policy of ‘Any Willing Provider’ (AWP), which
had changed to ‘Any Qualified Provider (AQP). It was a semantic difference that
was hailed by the Liberal Democrats as a victory. In reality the AWP
commissioning procedure is set by an EU procurement directive, and the term
‘AQP’ does not exist in EU law.
The British Medical Journal
highlighted the significance of this change in an editorial
aimed at the media, who at the time had failed to pick up on it: ‘If a future
government wishes to bring a health or social care service back into public
sector provision (say if the consequences of this reform turn out to be bad for
patients) any existing or would-be provider may sue under EU law on
anticompetitive practices.’
The NHSPN, however, did not
want to take chances over any weakening of competition in the bill, and having
‘agreed on the approach’ to take with Mr Bubb in a previous ‘lengthy’ meeting,
they turned their attention to Earl Howe, who would be leading the debate in
the House of Lords.
On the 19th of May 2011, David
Worskett, the director of NHSPN, set up another meeting with the Earl. A newly
discovered document for the NHSPN’s members revealed that ‘Simon Burns also
asked to join the meeting’. Mr Burns’ request to be included, according to Mr
Worskett, indicated the recognition by the minister that NHSPN were ‘less than
happy about things.’
The meeting went well for
the lobbyists. The document revealed that although the ministers were
‘necessarily constrained’ by the fact that everyone was supposed to be
listening, they gave ‘every signal possible that they understood and
sympathised with our concerns and shared our view of the key issues and
priorities.’
Indeed this understanding
was absolute. Earl Howe offered a ‘depiction’ of the ‘Government position’,
that meant ‘“choice” was a non-negotiable.’ This view led Mr Worskett to say:
‘He could have been delivering a précis of our briefing notes (which of course
he had already seen)’. No wonder then that later in the day at a National
Stakeholder Forum, Earl Howe ‘endorsed [Mr Worskett’s] arguments twice during
the session on competition and regulation’.
The NHS Partners Network
are not finished lobbying yet, having recently responded to the first stage of
the health regulator’s (Monitor’s) review into the fair playing field for NHS
providers. They held a meeting under the auspices of the right-wing think tank
"Reform" with David Bennett, the head of Monitor who are running the
review. A fair playing field has nothing to do with it. If that were the case,
then Simon Burns et al would not have offered a reassurance on policy ahead of
a debate in the Commons. The NHSPN’s press release announcing their submission
to the review states: ‘We look forward to working with Monitor throughout the
consultation process.’
I bet they do.
Unanswered questions
So why were the trio of
Simon Burns, Earl Howe and Andrew Lansley’s special advisor, Bill Morgan,
holding a meeting to reassure a trade and lobby group, before our elected MPs
had even had a chance to debate the bill in the Commons?
Did Bill Morgan pass a
message back to Andrew Lansley or did Andrew Lansley pass a message onto NHS
Partners Network?
Further notes:
The newly appointed special
advisor to Andrew Lansley, Bill Morgan. The former private healthcare lobbyist
came under the spotlight in March 2011, following an investigation by
transparency campaigners Spinwatch.
Mr Morgan had received a list of GPs who were in favour of the reforms, who
would represent a ‘public relations coup.’ The list was provided by an
outsourcing firm called Tribal, who according to Spinwatch, had ‘£150 million
worth of government contracts’, and were connected to some of the new GP
Pathfinder Consortia.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)